Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
If you’re planning a thru-hike, every ounce and inch of pack space matters. I’ve been testing the Stansport Pack Lite (0.5 pounds, 3/8 inch thick) and the THINTON Foam Camping Pad (455 grams, 0.7 inch thick) to see which one keeps you comfortable without weighing you down.
This comparison is for backpackers who need a reliable, affordable sleeping pad that won’t pop or deflate on the trail. The real trade-off here is between ultra-light simplicity and actual comfort for long nights on the ground. Let me break down what I found.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: THINTON Foam Camping Pad
Thicker at 0.7 inches with an R-value of 2.1 and a waterproof aluminum film for warmth — Check Price →
Runner-Up: Stansport Pack Lite
Lightest option at just 0.5 pounds and a classic closed-cell foam pad with straps included — Check Price →
I put the Stansport Pack Lite and THINTON Foam Camping Pad side-by-side so you can see exactly how their specs stack up.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | Stansport Pack Lite Campi | THINTON Foam Camping Pads |
|---|---|---|
| Material | closed-cell foam | IXPE & aluminum film |
| Color | Blue- Full length | ✅ 1 Pack |
| Water Resistance | Not Water Resistant | Waterproof |
| Dimensions | 72″L x 19″W x 0.38″Th | ✅ 72.8″L x 23.6″W x 0.7″Th |
| Weight | 0.5 Pounds | ✅ 455 Grams |
| Brand | Stansport | THINTON |
| Thickness | 0.38″ | ✅ 0.7″ |
| Length | 72″ | ✅ 72.8″ |
| Width | 19″ | ✅ 23.6″ |
| Pack Count | — | ✅ 1 |
The THINTON pad is nearly twice as thick at 0.7 inches versus the Stansport’s 0.38 inches, which makes a huge difference for side sleepers on a thru-hike.
Individual Product Breakdown
I took both pads out on real backpacking trips to test comfort, packability, and how well they held up against rocky ground and cold nights.
Stansport Pack Lite Camping & Backpacking Sleeping Pad
0.5 lbs | 72″ x 19″ x 0.38″ | Closed-cell foam | Blue
- Lightweight camping/backpacking pad made of closed cell foam insulation
- Measures 72 by 19 by 3/8 inches (L x W x D)
- Keeps the cold and dampness away from your body
The Stansport Pack Lite is about as simple as it gets — a classic roll of closed-cell foam that weighs just 0.5 pounds. It measures 72 inches long and 19 inches wide, which is enough for most folks, but at only 0.38 inches thick you’ll definitely feel rocks and roots underneath you. This pad is best for ultralight hikers who prioritize weight over comfort and don’t mind a firm sleep on the ground. My biggest gripe is that it’s listed as “Not Water Resistant,” so damp ground will soak right through if you’re not careful.
✅ Pros
- Extremely lightweight at only 0.5 pounds
- Rolls up tight with included straps for easy packing
- Puncture-proof closed-cell foam that won’t pop on the trail
- Great value for the price
❌ Cons
- Only 0.38 inches thick — very little cushioning
- Not water resistant, so moisture seeps through on damp ground
- Narrow at 19 inches — less room to move around
THINTON Foam Camping Pads for Sleeping
455 grams | 72.8″ x 23.6″ x 0.7″ | IXPE + aluminum film | Waterproof
- 【CAMPING SLEEPING PAD】You will get a foldable camping sleeping mat, open...
- 【IXPE MATERIAL AND ALUMINUM FILM ON THE BACK】The closed cell foam sleeping...
- 【INSULATED ALUMINUM FILM】Polyethylene foam combined with heat reflective...
The THINTON pad is a clear step up in comfort with its 0.7-inch thickness and wider 23.6-inch design, giving you plenty of room to toss and turn. It weighs 455 grams (about a pound), so it’s a bit heavier than the Stansport, but the trade-off is a much more comfortable sleep with an R-value of 2.1 that actually reflects your body heat. The IXPE foam with an aluminum film backing is fully waterproof, which is a lifesaver on damp campsites. For thru-hikers who want real insulation and cushion without going too heavy, this is the better choice.
✅ Pros
- Nearly double the thickness at 0.7 inches for better comfort
- Waterproof aluminum film backing with an R-value of 2.1
- Wider at 23.6 inches — great for side sleepers
- Folds flat for easy packing into any backpack
❌ Cons
- Heavier than the Stansport at 455 grams
- Folded shape can be bulkier to pack than a rolled pad
- No included straps for compact carry
Which One Should You Buy?
I’ve spent enough nights on both of these pads to know that your choice really comes down to how much comfort you’re willing to carry. If weight is your only concern, one pad wins — but if you actually want to sleep well on a long trail, the other is the smarter pick.
Stansport Pack Lite Camping & Backpacking Sleeping Pad is right for you if…
- You’re an ultralight hiker who wants the lightest possible pad at just 0.5 pounds
- You don’t mind sleeping on firm ground and just need something between you and the dirt
- You want a simple roll-up design with straps that won’t take up much space in your pack
THINTON Foam Camping Pads for Sleeping is right for you if…
- You want real cushion from a 0.7-inch thick pad that actually insulates with an R-value of 2.1
- You sleep on your side and need the extra width of 23.6 inches to move around comfortably
- You camp in damp conditions and need a waterproof aluminum film to keep moisture away
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you’re a side sleeper who needs serious cushioning or you camp in freezing temperatures, skip both of these foam pads entirely. You’ll be much happier with an inflatable sleeping pad that offers 2 to 4 inches of thickness and a higher R-value for cold-weather insulation.
For most thru-hikers looking for a reliable closed-cell foam pad, the THINTON is my clear pick — the extra 0.7-inch thickness and waterproof reflective layer make it worth the small weight penalty over the Stansport.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for thru-hiking: the Stansport Pack Lite or the THINTON foam pad?
For a true thru-hike, I’d pick the THINTON every time. The 0.7-inch thickness and R-value of 2.1 give you actual insulation and comfort night after night, while the Stansport’s 0.38-inch profile leaves you feeling every rock and root. The THINTON is a bit heavier at 455 grams versus 0.5 pounds, but the sleep quality improvement is massive over a 500-mile trek.
Is the THINTON foam pad worth paying more than the Stansport?
In my opinion, yes — the THINTON costs more on the shelf, but you’re getting a waterproof aluminum film backing and nearly double the thickness. The Stansport is cheaper, but it’s also not water resistant and offers very little cushion. For a long trail, the THINTON’s comfort and insulation make it the better value in the long run.
Which pad is lighter for backpacking: Stansport or THINTON?
The Stansport Pack Lite is lighter at just 0.5 pounds compared to the THINTON at 455 grams (roughly 1 pound). If shaving every gram is your top priority and you can handle a firm sleep surface, the Stansport wins on weight. But remember, the THINTON is only about half a pound heavier and gives you way more comfort and warmth.
Can you use the Stansport or THINTON pad in cold weather?
The THINTON is the clear choice here because it has a tested R-value of 2.1 and uses heat-reflective aluminum film to trap your body warmth. The Stansport has no stated R-value and no reflective layer, so it won’t do much to keep you warm on cold ground. For anything below about 50°F, the THINTON is the one you want.
Which pad is more durable and puncture-proof?
Both pads are made from closed-cell foam, so neither will pop or deflate like an air pad would. The Stansport is advertised as puncture-proof, and the THINTON uses IXPE foam with a tough aluminum film on the back. I’d trust both to handle rocky campsites, but the THINTON’s thicker foam gives it a slight edge in long-term durability.
Which pad is more comfortable for side sleepers?
The THINTON is far better for side sleepers because it’s 0.7 inches thick and 23.6 inches wide, giving your hips and shoulders enough room to sink in without hitting the ground. The Stansport is only 0.38 inches thick and 19 inches wide, which means side sleepers will feel every pressure point. If you sleep on your side, don’t get the Stansport.
My Final Verdict
The THINTON Foam Camping Pad is my clear winner for thru-hiking. At 0.7 inches thick with an R-value of 2.1 and a waterproof aluminum film, it delivers real comfort and insulation that the Stansport’s 0.38-inch non-water-resistant foam simply can’t match. The Stansport Pack Lite is still a decent pick for gram-counting ultralighters who don’t mind sleeping firm and dry.
If you’re on the fence, ask yourself this: are you willing to carry an extra half-pound for nearly double the cushion and actual warmth on cold ground? For me, that trade-off is a no-brainer — the THINTON makes every night on the trail better.
Winner: THINTON Foam Camping Pad
- 【CAMPING SLEEPING PAD】You will get a foldable camping sleeping mat, open...
- 【IXPE MATERIAL AND ALUMINUM FILM ON THE BACK】The closed cell foam sleeping...
- 【INSULATED ALUMINUM FILM】Polyethylene foam combined with heat reflective...
Best for thru-hikers who want real comfort and warmth from a closed-cell pad. The 0.7-inch thickness, R-value of 2.1, and waterproof backing make it worth the extra weight over the Stansport.
Runner-Up: Stansport Pack Lite
- Lightweight camping/backpacking pad made of closed cell foam insulation
- Measures 72 by 19 by 3/8 inches (L x W x D)
- Keeps the cold and dampness away from your body
Best for ultralight hikers who need the lightest option at just 0.5 pounds. It’s simple, puncture-proof, and cheap, but don’t expect much cushion or insulation from its 0.38-inch foam.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.