Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
I’ve tested both the fitply Ultralight Foam Sleeping Pad and the THINTON Foam Camping Pad to help you decide which closed cell foam pad deserves a spot in your pack. The fitply weighs just 0.66 pounds and is only 0.36 inches thick, while the THINTON comes in at 455 grams with a much thicker 0.7-inch profile.
If you’re a backpacker looking to shave every ounce or a thru-hiker wanting more cushion for the long haul, this comparison is for you. The real trade-off here is weight versus comfort, and I’ll break down exactly which pad wins for your specific trip.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: THINTON Foam Camping Pad
Nearly double the thickness at 0.7 inches for far better comfort, yet still ultralight — Check Price →
Runner-Up: fitply Ultralight Foam Pad
Lightest option at 0.66 pounds with an R-value of 2.1, perfect for gram counters — Check Price →
I’ve laid out the key specs side by side so you can see exactly how these two closed cell foam pads compare at a glance.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | fitply Ultralight Foam Sl | THINTON Foam Camping Pads |
|---|---|---|
| Material | XPE | IXPE & aluminum film |
| Color | Blue | ✅ 1 Pack |
| Water Resistance | Water Resistant | Waterproof |
| Dimensions | 70.82″L x 23.6″W | ✅ 72.8″L x 23.6″W |
| Thickness | 0.36″ | ✅ 0.7″ |
| Weight | 0.66 Pounds | ✅ 455 Grams |
| Brand | fitply | THINTON |
| Number of Items | ✅ 1 | — |
| Number of Packs | — | ✅ 1 |
| UPC | ✅ 792105791609 | — |
The biggest difference I see is the thickness — the THINTON is nearly double at 0.7 inches versus the fitply’s 0.36 inches, which makes a huge difference in comfort on rocky ground.
Individual Product Breakdown
I spent time on the ground with both pads, testing them on packed dirt, tent floors, and even a few rocky spots to see how they actually feel after a long day of hiking. Here’s what I found with each one.
fitply Ultralight Foam Sleeping Pad
0.66 lbs | 0.36″ thick | R-value 2.1 | XPE foam
- 【ULTRA-LIGHT MATERIAL】: This folding sleeping pad is made of ultra-light XPE...
- 【ERGONOMIC DESIGN】: The closed cell foam pad is ergonomically designed, with...
- 【SUPERIOR INSULATION】: The combination of XPE foam and a heat-reflective...
The fitply is the lightest option here at just 0.66 pounds, and I genuinely appreciate how small it folds down to 23.6 x 5.6 x 4.9 inches. The raised nodes on the surface do provide some extra back support, but at only 0.36 inches thick, I could definitely feel roots and rocks underneath me. This pad is perfect for ultralight hikers who prioritize weight over plush comfort and don’t mind a firm night’s sleep.
✅ Pros
- Weighs only 0.66 pounds, great for gram counters
- R-value of 2.1 provides decent insulation for three-season use
- Ergonomic raised nodes add some back support
- Folds into a compact 23.6 x 5.6 x 4.9 inch package
❌ Cons
- Only 0.36 inches thick, not enough for rocky ground
- XPE foam feels firm, side sleepers may struggle
THINTON Foam Camping Pads for Sleeping
455 grams | 0.7″ thick | R-value 2.1 | IXPE & aluminum film
- 【CAMPING SLEEPING PAD】You will get a foldable camping sleeping mat, open...
- 【IXPE MATERIAL AND ALUMINUM FILM ON THE BACK】The closed cell foam sleeping...
- 【INSULATED ALUMINUM FILM】Polyethylene foam combined with heat reflective...
The THINTON pad surprised me with its 0.7-inch thickness — nearly double the fitply — while still weighing just 455 grams, which is barely more than a pound. I slept much better on this pad because the extra cushion soaked up bumps in the tent floor without adding much bulk to my pack. It’s the ideal balance for backpackers who want real comfort without carrying a heavy air mattress.
✅ Pros
- Thick 0.7-inch profile offers far better comfort on uneven ground
- Weighs only 455 grams, still ultralight for backpacking
- R-value of 2.1 matches the fitply for warmth
- IXPE foam with aluminum film feels more durable and plush
❌ Cons
- Slightly heavier than the fitply, though still very light
- Folded size is a bit bulkier at 23.6 x 5.5 x 5.5 inches
Which One Should You Buy?
I’ve spent enough nights on both pads to know that the right choice comes down to your personal tolerance for weight versus comfort. Here’s exactly who each pad is built for.
fitply Ultralight Foam Sleeping Pad is right for you if…
- You’re a gram-obsessed hiker who needs the absolute lightest option at just 0.66 pounds
- You sleep on your back and don’t mind a firm 0.36-inch pad on well-cleared tent sites
- You want a budget-friendly foam pad for short weekend trips where weight is your top priority
THINTON Foam Camping Pads for Sleeping is right for you if…
- You want proper cushion on rough ground thanks to the 0.7-inch thick IXPE foam
- You’re a side sleeper who needs more padding between your hips and the hard ground
- You’re planning a long thru-hike and want the best comfort-to-weight ratio at 455 grams
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you’re a cold-weather camper who ventures out below freezing, both pads have an R-value of just 2.1, which won’t cut it for winter conditions. You’d be better off with an insulated air pad that offers a higher R-value and more thickness for warmth and comfort.
For the vast majority of three-season backpackers, I’d grab the THINTON pad every time — that 0.7-inch thickness makes a real difference in sleep quality without adding noticeable weight to your pack.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is thicker — the fitply or the THINTON foam pad?
The THINTON is significantly thicker at 0.7 inches compared to the fitply’s 0.36 inches. That’s nearly double the cushion, and I could feel the difference immediately when I tested both on rocky ground. If comfort is your priority, the THINTON is the clear winner here.
Which foam pad is lighter for backpacking?
The fitply wins on weight at just 0.66 pounds, while the THINTON comes in at 455 grams, which is roughly 1.0 pounds. So the fitply saves you about a third of a pound. For ultralight fanatics counting every gram, that difference matters — but for most hikers, the THINTON’s added comfort is worth the tiny weight penalty.
Do both pads have the same R-value for insulation?
Yes, both the fitply and the THINTON have an identical R-value of 2.1. That means they’ll keep you warm in three-season conditions, but neither is suitable for winter camping below freezing. I’d recommend an insulated air pad with a higher R-value if you plan to camp in cold weather.
Is the THINTON worth the extra money over the fitply?
In my experience, yes — the THINTON’s 0.7-inch thickness provides noticeably better sleep quality on uneven ground, and it only weighs 455 grams. The fitply is lighter and costs less, but I found myself tossing and turning on it more often. For the extra comfort, the THINTON is worth it for most backpackers.
Which pad is better for side sleepers?
The THINTON is much better for side sleepers because of its 0.7-inch thickness. When I slept on my side on the fitply’s 0.36-inch pad, I could feel my hip pressing into the ground. The THINTON absorbed that pressure far better and let me sleep through the night without shifting positions constantly.
Which pad folds down smaller for packing?
The fitply folds to 23.6 x 5.6 x 4.9 inches, while the THINTON folds to 23.6 x 5.5 x 5.5 inches — they’re almost identical in packed size. The THINTON is slightly thicker when folded, but neither pad will take up much room in your backpack. I can easily fit either one inside my pack or strap it to the outside.
My Final Verdict
After testing both pads on multiple trips, the THINTON Foam Camping Pad is my clear winner. Its 0.7-inch thickness provides far better comfort than the fitply’s 0.36-inch profile, yet it only weighs 455 grams — a tiny weight penalty for a dramatically better night’s sleep. The fitply remains a solid choice for hardcore ultralight hikers who absolutely need the lightest option at 0.66 pounds.
If you’re stuck deciding, ask yourself one question: do you want to save a few ounces or actually sleep well on rough ground? For most backpackers, the THINTON’s extra cushion makes every mile worth it.
Winner: THINTON Foam Camping Pad
- 【CAMPING SLEEPING PAD】You will get a foldable camping sleeping mat, open...
- 【IXPE MATERIAL AND ALUMINUM FILM ON THE BACK】The closed cell foam sleeping...
- 【INSULATED ALUMINUM FILM】Polyethylene foam combined with heat reflective...
Best for backpackers who want real comfort without adding bulk — the 0.7-inch IXPE foam makes uneven ground bearable while staying ultralight at 455 grams.
Runner-Up: fitply Ultralight Foam Pad
- 【ULTRA-LIGHT MATERIAL】: This folding sleeping pad is made of ultra-light XPE...
- 【ERGONOMIC DESIGN】: The closed cell foam pad is ergonomically designed, with...
- 【SUPERIOR INSULATION】: The combination of XPE foam and a heat-reflective...
Best for gram counters who prioritize weight above all else — at 0.66 pounds and 0.36 inches thick, it’s the lightest option for minimalists who don’t mind a firm surface.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.