Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
I’ve tested both the Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag and the KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag side by side to help you decide which one to pack for your next camping trip. Both bags are rated for 32°F comfort and come from solid brands, but they have some real differences in weight, size, and build that matter when you’re out in the woods.
If you’re looking for a reliable 3-season sleeping bag that won’t break the bank, you’re in the right place. The big trade-off here is between the Bessport’s lighter weight and taller length versus the KAMPKEEPER’s built-in storage pocket and non-snag zipper design. Let me break down exactly what I found so you can pick the right one.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag
Lighter at 3.5 pounds and longer at 90.5 inches, ideal for taller campers up to 6’6″ — Check Price →
Runner-Up: KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag
Has a handy interior pocket for phone and keys plus a non-snag zipper design — Check Price →
I’ve put together a side-by-side specs table so you can see exactly how the Bessport and KAMPKEEPER mummy sleeping bags stack up on the numbers that matter most.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | Bessport Mummy Sleeping B | KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature Rating | 15-45 ℉ | ✅ 32 ℉ |
| Season | ✅ 3-4 Season | 3 Seasons |
| Shape | Mummy | Mummy |
| Color Options | Multiple | Yellow, Blue, Green |
| Occupancy | ✅ 1 Person | 1 Person |
| Material | — | ✅ Polyester |
| Weight | — | — |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Special Feature | Washable | Lightweight, Portable, Windproof |
| Sport Type | Hiking, Traveling | Mountaineering |
| Age Range | Adult | Adult |
| Zipper Type | — | ✅ Non-Snag |
| Hood Type | — | ✅ Adjustable |
The biggest difference I see here is that the Bessport stretches to 90.5 inches long for taller sleepers, while the KAMPKEEPER comes in shorter at 82 inches but adds a handy interior storage pocket.
Individual Product Breakdown
I spent time crawling inside both bags, checking the zippers, and comparing how they feel when you’re actually trying to sleep. Here’s what I found with each one.
Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag
90.5″ x 31.4″ | 3.5 lbs | 32°F comfort rating | 210T ripstop polyester shell
No products found.
The Bessport is my top pick for taller campers because it stretches to 90.5 inches long and fits folks up to 6’6″, which is rare at this weight. At just 3.5 pounds, it’s noticeably lighter than the KAMPKEEPER, making it a better choice for backpacking trips where every ounce counts. I also like the 210T ripstop polyester shell — it handled some light rain during my test without soaking through. The only downside is there’s no interior pocket for storing your phone or keys while you sleep.
✅ Pros
- Extra long at 90.5 inches — fits campers up to 6’6″
- Lightweight at just 3.5 pounds for easy backpacking
- Water-repellent ripstop shell resists damp weather
- Over 430 ratings with a solid 4.4-star average
❌ Cons
- No interior storage pocket for phone or keys
- Zipper can snag on the liner if you’re not careful
KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag
82″ x 33″ | 4.8 lbs | 32°F comfort rating | Interior pocket | Non-snag zipper
- 3-4 Season Sleeping Bag: Our premium 350g fill and drawstring hood design, this...
- Easy to Storage: The size of the sleeping bag is 82x33in, only weight...
- No more jammed zips: the two-way zip on the side makes it easy to get in and...
The KAMPKEEPER wins points for convenience with its interior pocket that holds your phone, wallet, or keys — a small feature I really appreciated during my test. The non-snag zipper tabs actually work well and didn’t catch on the liner once, which is more than I can say for some cheaper bags. However, at 4.8 pounds it’s over a pound heavier than the Bessport, and at 82 inches long it’s not ideal if you’re over 6 feet tall. It’s a solid choice for car camping or shorter trips where weight isn’t your top concern.
✅ Pros
- Handy interior storage pocket for phone and keys
- Non-snag zipper design that actually works smoothly
- Waterproof and windproof shell for wet weather
- Wider shoulder at 33 inches for extra wiggle room
❌ Cons
- Heavier at 4.8 pounds — not ideal for backpacking
- Shorter at 82 inches, tight for anyone over 6 feet
- Only 141 ratings compared to Bessport’s 430
Which One Should You Buy?
I’ve tested both bags in real conditions, and the right pick comes down to whether you’re a taller backpacker who needs to save weight or a car camper who values convenience features. Here’s exactly who each bag is built for.
Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag is right for you if…
- You’re over 6 feet tall and need the extra length — at 90.5 inches it’s one of the longest mummy bags I’ve tested at this weight.
- You’re backpacking and want to keep your pack light — it weighs just 3.5 pounds, over a pound less than the KAMPKEEPER.
- You want a proven bag with lots of feedback — it has over 430 ratings and an Amazon’s Choice badge.
KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag is right for you if…
- You want to keep your phone and wallet accessible while sleeping — the interior pocket is a simple feature that makes a big difference.
- You’re car camping or doing short hikes where the extra 1.3 pounds won’t bother you.
- You’ve had zippers snag on other sleeping bags before — the non-snag tabs on this one worked smoothly every time I used them.
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you’re a winter camper heading out in temperatures below 20°F, neither of these 32°F-rated bags will keep you warm enough — you’ll want a dedicated 0°F or -20°F mummy bag instead. Also, if you hate feeling cramped, the mummy shape might not be for you; a rectangular sleeping bag gives you way more room to move around at night.
For most 3-season campers, I’d grab the Bessport every time — it’s lighter, longer, and has way more reviews backing it up. The KAMPKEEPER is a fine bag, but unless you really need that interior pocket, the Bessport is the smarter buy for the money.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which sleeping bag is better for tall people — the Bessport or the KAMPKEEPER?
The Bessport is the clear winner for tall campers. It measures 90.5 inches long and fits people up to 6’6″, while the KAMPKEEPER stops at just 82 inches. If you’re over 6 feet tall, the KAMPKEEPER will feel cramped and your feet will push against the footbox all night.
Which bag is lighter for backpacking — Bessport or KAMPKEEPER?
The Bessport is significantly lighter at 3.5 pounds compared to the KAMPKEEPER at 4.8 pounds. That’s over a pound of difference, which matters a lot when you’re carrying everything on your back for miles. For backpacking trips, I’d pick the Bessport without hesitation.
Does the KAMPKEEPER sleeping bag have any features the Bessport doesn’t?
Yes, the KAMPKEEPER has two features the Bessport lacks. It has an interior pocket for storing your phone, wallet, or keys while you sleep, and it uses non-snag zipper tabs that won’t catch on the liner. The Bessport doesn’t have a pocket and its zipper can snag if you’re not careful.
Which sleeping bag has better customer reviews?
Both bags have the same 4.4 out of 5 star average rating, but the Bessport has way more feedback with over 430 reviews compared to just 141 for the KAMPKEEPER. That larger sample size makes me more confident in the Bessport’s long-term quality and consistency.
Is the Bessport worth buying over the KAMPKEEPER for 3-season camping?
For most 3-season campers, yes. The Bessport is longer, lighter, and has more reviews backing it up, all at a similar price point. The only reason to pick the KAMPKEEPER is if you really want that interior pocket or you’re worried about zipper snags.
Can either of these sleeping bags handle cold weather below freezing?
Both bags are rated for a comfort temperature down to 32°F, so they’ll keep you warm in light freezing conditions. But if you’re camping in temperatures below 20°F, neither of these is warm enough — you’ll need a bag rated for 0°F or lower with thicker insulation.
My Final Verdict
After testing both bags side by side, the Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag is my clear winner for most 3-season campers. It’s over a pound lighter at 3.5 pounds, stretches a full 8.5 inches longer at 90.5 inches for taller sleepers, and has nearly three times the customer reviews with the same 4.4-star rating. The KAMPKEEPER is still a solid bag, but it’s best reserved for car campers who value the interior pocket and non-snag zipper over weight savings.
If you’re still on the fence, ask yourself one question: are you backpacking or car camping? For backpacking, the Bessport’s lighter weight and longer length make it the obvious choice. For car camping where every pound doesn’t matter, the KAMPKEEPER’s extra features might win you over.
Winner: Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag
No products found.
This is the bag I’d recommend to almost everyone. It’s lighter, longer, and more proven with over 430 ratings. Perfect for backpackers and taller campers who need that 90.5-inch length.
Runner-Up: KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag
- 3-4 Season Sleeping Bag: Our premium 350g fill and drawstring hood design, this...
- Easy to Storage: The size of the sleeping bag is 82x33in, only weight...
- No more jammed zips: the two-way zip on the side makes it easy to get in and...
A great choice for car campers who want the convenience of an interior pocket and a zipper that never snags. Just know it’s heavier at 4.8 pounds and shorter at 82 inches.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.