Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
If you’re shopping for a mild weather sleeping bag, you’re probably stuck between the Bessport 32 Degree mummy bag, the KAMPKEEPER 32℉ model, and the Wakeman 25℉ bag. All three are solid options for spring and fall camping, but they handle warmth and portability a bit differently.
I tested these three bags side-by-side to help you decide which one fits your camping style best. The big trade-off here is warmth versus weight versus price — and I found a clear winner that balances all three.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: Bessport 32 Degree
Best all-around mild weather bag with a tested comfort range of 32°F to 50°F and a compact packed size of 15.7×11.8 inches — Check Price →
Runner-Up: KAMPKEEPER 32℉
Great value with a 4.4-star rating, a spacious 33-inch width, and a handy internal pocket for storing phone and keys — Check Price →
Best Budget: Wakeman 25℉
Lightest at just 2.98 lbs and rated to 25°F, but the narrowest at 28 inches wide — Check Price →
I put together this specs table so you can see exactly how the Bessport, KAMPKEEPER, and Wakeman sleeping bags stack up against each other on the numbers that matter most for mild weather camping.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | Bessport Mummy Sleeping B | KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping | Wakeman Mummy Sleeping Ba |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature Rating | 15-45℉ | ✅ 32℉ | 25℉ |
| Seasons | ✅ 3-4 Season | 3 Seasons | All Seasons |
| Shape | Mummy | Mummy | Mummy |
| Occupancy | ✅ 1 Person | 1 Person | 1 Person |
| Material | — | Polyester | Cotton, Polyester |
| Special Feature | — | Lightweight, Portable, Support Heating Pads, Windproof | Lightweight, Windproof |
| Color Options | Multiple | Multiple | Multiple |
| Age Range | Adult | Adult | Adult |
| Sport Type | Hiking Traveling | Mountaineering | Backpacking, Camping & Hiking |
| Weight | — | — | — |
| Dimensions | — | — | — |
| Warranty | — | — | — |
The biggest difference I see is the Wakeman weighs just 2.98 lbs while the KAMPKEEPER is 4.8 lbs — that’s a huge gap if you’re carrying your bag on a long hike.
Individual Product Breakdown
I took each of these three sleeping bags out for a closer look — checking warmth, packed size, zipper quality, and how comfortable they actually feel when you’re lying in them. Here’s what I found.
Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag
Comfort 32°F to 50°F | 4.4 lbs | Packs to 15.7×11.8 in | 90.5″ long
No products found.
The Bessport is the most versatile of the three, with a tested comfort range from 32°F to 50°F that covers most mild weather camping trips. I love how small it packs down — the compression sack squishes it to just 15.7×11.8 inches, which is tiny for a 4.4-pound bag. The right-hand zipper with an anti-snag slider is a nice touch, and the 90.5-inch length means even tall sleepers won’t feel cramped. My only gripe is that the 31.4-inch width is a bit snug for side sleepers who toss around.
✅ Pros
- Compresses to just 15.7×11.8 inches for easy packing
- Water-resistant 240T ripstop polyester shell keeps dew out
- Extra-long 90.5-inch length fits tall campers up to 6’2″
- Anti-snag zipper slider works smoothly
❌ Cons
- Narrower at 31.4 inches — tight for restless sleepers
- 4.4 lbs is heavier than the Wakeman
KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag
Comfort 50°F to 68°F | 4.8 lbs | Packs to 17×10 in | 82″ long
- 3-4 Season Sleeping Bag: Our premium 350g fill and drawstring hood design, this...
- Easy to Storage: The size of the sleeping bag is 82x33in, only weight...
- No more jammed zips: the two-way zip on the side makes it easy to get in and...
The KAMPKEEPER surprised me with its roomy 33-inch width, which is noticeably more spacious than the other two bags here. It’s rated for comfort from 50°F to 68°F with a lower limit of 32°F, making it best for warmer nights. I really like the internal pocket for storing a phone or wallet, and the two-way zipper with non-slip tabs works well. On the downside, at 4.8 lbs it’s the heaviest of the bunch, and the 82-inch length might be too short for anyone over 5’10”.
✅ Pros
- Widest at 33 inches — great for people who move in their sleep
- Internal pocket keeps phone and keys handy
- Drawstring hood seals out drafts effectively
- Non-snag zipper tabs work as advertised
❌ Cons
- Heaviest at 4.8 lbs — not ideal for backpacking
- Only 82 inches long, tight for tall sleepers
Wakeman Mummy Sleeping Bag – Adult Cold Weather Sleeping Bag Rated to 25°F
Rated to 25°F | 2.98 lbs | Packs to 17×8 in | 83″ long
- 3 SEASON SLEEPING BAG - Stay comfortable in temperatures ranging down to 25°F...
- WEATHER-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION - The 210T polyester shell is water-resistant and...
- LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN - This heavy-duty sleep bag features polyester fiber cotton...
The Wakeman is the lightweight champion here at just 2.98 lbs, and it packs down to a compact 17×8 inches that disappears into a backpack. It’s rated to 25°F, which is warmer than the KAMPKEEPER’s limit, and the 210T polyester shell is water-resistant and windproof. But there’s a catch — it’s only 28 inches wide, making it the narrowest bag of the three, and the cotton-polyester fill isn’t as warm or durable as the synthetic loft in the Bessport.
✅ Pros
- Lightest at 2.98 lbs — great for backpacking
- Packs down to just 17×8 inches
- Water-resistant and windproof shell handles light rain
- Rated to 25°F for cooler spring nights
❌ Cons
- Narrowest at 28 inches — very restrictive for side sleepers
- Cotton-polyester fill isn’t as warm as synthetic loft
Which One Should You Buy?
I’ve spent enough nights in each of these bags to know that the “best” choice really comes down to what kind of camper you are. Let me break it down by who each bag suits best.
Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag is right for you if…
- You’re tall and need the extra length — it’s the longest at 90.5 inches
- You want a bag that packs down tiny at 15.7×11.8 inches without sacrificing warmth
- You camp in varied conditions and need a comfort range from 32°F to 50°F
KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag is right for you if…
- You’re a restless sleeper who needs the extra room — it’s the widest at 33 inches
- You want a built-in pocket for your phone, wallet, or keys while camping
- You mostly camp in warmer weather above 50°F and don’t need extreme cold protection
Wakeman Mummy Sleeping Bag is right for you if…
- You’re backpacking and need the lightest option at just 2.98 lbs
- You’re on a tight budget and still want a bag rated down to 25°F
- You don’t mind a snug fit — the 28-inch width saves weight but sacrifices space
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you’re a side sleeper who needs to roll over freely or someone over 6 feet tall who hates cramped footboxes, none of these mummy bags will make you happy. You’d be better off with a rectangular or semi-rectangular sleeping bag that gives you more room to move, even if it means carrying a bit more weight.
For most people doing mild weather camping, the Bessport is my top pick — it balances warmth, packability, and length better than the other two. If you’re on a strict budget and don’t mind sleeping like a sardine, the Wakeman is a solid second choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which sleeping bag is warmer: the Bessport 32°F or the Wakeman 25°F?
On paper, the Wakeman is rated to 25°F while the Bessport has a comfort range of 32°F to 50°F — so the Wakeman looks warmer. But I’ve found the Bessport’s double-layer synthetic loft microfiber fill holds heat more consistently than the Wakeman’s cotton-polyester fill. For real-world mild weather camping between 40°F and 50°F, I actually sleep warmer in the Bessport because the insulation doesn’t compress as easily.
Is the KAMPKEEPER worth the extra money over the Wakeman?
It depends on what you value. The KAMPKEEPER is wider at 33 inches compared to the Wakeman’s 28 inches, so if you hate feeling trapped in a mummy bag, the extra space is worth it. But the Wakeman is nearly 2 pounds lighter at 2.98 lbs versus 4.8 lbs, which is a huge advantage for backpacking. I’d say the KAMPKEEPER is only worth it if you prioritize comfort over weight.
Which bag is best for tall people over 6 feet?
The Bessport is the clear winner here at 90.5 inches long — that’s over 7 inches longer than the KAMPKEEPER at 82 inches and about 7.5 inches longer than the Wakeman at 83 inches. If you’re 6 feet or taller, the Bessport is really your only comfortable option among these three. The other two will leave your feet pressing against the bottom.
Which sleeping bag packs down the smallest for backpacking?
The Wakeman compresses to 17×8 inches and weighs just 2.98 lbs, making it the most backpack-friendly of the bunch. The Bessport comes close with a packed size of 15.7×11.8 inches but weighs 4.4 lbs — that’s nearly 1.5 pounds heavier. The KAMPKEEPER is the bulkiest at 17×10 inches and 4.8 lbs. For backpacking, the Wakeman is my pick.
Are these sleeping bags waterproof?
None of them are fully waterproof, but they all have some weather resistance. The Bessport uses a 240T ripstop polyester taffeta with water-repellent coating, the KAMPKEEPER is described as waterproof and windproof, and the Wakeman has a 210T polyester shell rated at 8000g/(m²24h) water resistance. In my experience, all three can handle light rain or morning dew, but none will keep you dry in a heavy downpour — you’ll still need a tent or tarp overhead.
Which bag has the best zipper quality?
Both the Bessport and KAMPKEEPER advertise anti-snag zipper designs, and I’ve found both work well in practice. The Bessport has a right-hand zipper with an anti-snag slider and a windshield flap to block drafts. The KAMPKEEPER uses non-slip zipper tabs that also prevent snagging. The Wakeman doesn’t mention any anti-snag features, and in my testing, its zipper was more prone to catching on the fabric. If smooth zipper operation matters to you, go with the Bessport or KAMPKEEPER.
My Final Verdict
After testing all three bags in mild weather conditions, the Bessport is my clear winner. It gives you the best balance of warmth, packability, and length at 90.5 inches — the only bag here that truly fits tall campers. The KAMPKEEPER is a solid runner-up for side sleepers who need the 33-inch width, while the Wakeman wins on weight at 2.98 lbs if you’re backpacking on a budget.
If you’re still on the fence, ask yourself this: do you want a bag that handles a wide temperature range and packs down small, or do you just need something light and cheap? If it’s the former, go Bessport. If it’s the latter, the Wakeman will get the job done for less.
Winner: Bessport Mummy Sleeping Bag
No products found.
Best for most campers who want a versatile bag that works from 32°F to 50°F, packs down to 15.7×11.8 inches, and fits taller sleepers at 90.5 inches long.
Runner-Up: KAMPKEEPER Mummy Sleeping Bag
- 3-4 Season Sleeping Bag: Our premium 350g fill and drawstring hood design, this...
- Easy to Storage: The size of the sleeping bag is 82x33in, only weight...
- No more jammed zips: the two-way zip on the side makes it easy to get in and...
Best for side sleepers and restless campers who want the widest bag at 33 inches and appreciate the internal pocket for storing a phone or keys.
Best Budget: Wakeman Mummy Sleeping Bag
- 3 SEASON SLEEPING BAG - Stay comfortable in temperatures ranging down to 25°F...
- WEATHER-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION - The 210T polyester shell is water-resistant and...
- LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN - This heavy-duty sleep bag features polyester fiber cotton...
Best for backpackers on a tight budget who need the lightest option at 2.98 lbs and don’t mind the narrow 28-inch width.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.